Kirstenstudio

Bring our indie film history into the digital age

June 26th, 2016 by KirstenStudio
Respond

Working to ensure the availability of movies told from diverse perspectives, IndieCollect, a New York City nonprofit, has purchased a new 5k film scanner. The shiny red Kinetta (created by Jeff Kreines) will give film-based work a rebirth. While some venues still project film, they are few and far between, offering limited options for filmmakers with movies that remain on analog mediums.

Because preservation and access costs are on a steady rise, IndieCollect, seeks to offer filmmakers digital scanning services at nonprofit prices. This is potentially huge for the indie motion picture creator, many of whom have to practically beg, borrow, and beg again, just to get each film completed, much less worry about their long-term shelf life. The idea of financing the scanning of older work is usually put on a back burner indefinitely, even if makers realize the potential revenue opportunities. IndieCollect seeks to fill this gap in resources for its community, and to help make sure our shared American independent motion picture heritage is both saved and seen.

Making high-resolution scanning affordable not only benefits the filmmaker of course, but audiences too. With more indie films available on DVD, through streaming, or in theaters, cinephiles, as well as activists and educators will have access to important work. Some stories are only told through particular movies, by a range of storytellers whose voices don’t generally make the mainstream media cut. Unfortunately, a lot of them fall out of circulation as our ever-changing technology moves at fast-forward speed. Many films continue to be incredibly relevant regardless of their copyright year, but only if they’re out there and available.

Natural History (1986)

Natural History (1986)

The Kickstarter campaign will launch the scanning program with a collection of fiction shorts made under Apparatus Productions, an early ’80s nonprofit founded by the dynamic duo of Chrstine Vachon and Todd Haynes, along with Barry Ellsworth. However, this is just the beginning. If this campaign is successful, on the slate are award-winning documentaries, and other works, most of which haven’t seen the light of day in years.

Born digital movies are also at risk and IndieCollect is working to address preservation and access needs across all formats for any and all American independent motion pictures. A tall order, and the scanner is a significant step in that direction. As an archivist at IndieCollect, I can vouch first hand for the many lost treasures the organization continues to unearth, and the ways in which it is working to educate and support independent filmmakers so their work exists and is findable tomorrow. This is more than just a Kickstarter campaign. It may sound a little dramatic, but it really does represent part of a movement toward ensuring indie film’s longevity and securing its rightful place in our cultural history.

To find out more about this organization, visit www.indiecollect.org. Please consider supporting what Indiewire says is, “… one of the most incredible Kickstarter campaigns we’ve ever seen.”

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.

Creative fundraising

February 24th, 2016 by KirstenStudio
Respond

Budget CUBudgets are rarely considered part of the artistic process of filmmaking, yet fundraising for independent work, in particular documentary, requires a profound amount of creativity. Whether we like it or not, it is a necessary skill set in order to survive as media makers and artists. One unfortunate aspect of talking money is our society’s complex relationship with it, and many of us apply an on-guard or protective approach to the subject. As a result, open and frank sharing of information is lacking.

I’ve attended my share of budgeting and fundraising panels through various local organizations, which have offered valuable information. More recently, GETTING REAL, the 2014 IDA conference presented some unusually honest dialog about funding sources and how filmmakers are actually financing their projects. It was validating in a lot of ways, and a bit sobering. I believe the conference helped open the doors to the money conversation. It’s an issue that is only gaining importance, not only for filmmakers as individuals, but for the survival of the art form.

Lana Wilson's doc, AFTER TILLER

Lana Wilson’s doc, AFTER TILLER

UnionDocs held an Art of Asking workshop this past weekend, hosted and organized by producer, Adella Ladjevardi. The two-day event included guest speakers Lana Wilson, Tracie Holder and Anna Rose Holmer. Participants were at various stages of production and the experience was rather conversational, which aided to a relaxed atmosphere. Discussion ranged from guest speaker project examples and case studies, to the review of budget templates (yes, you should pay yourself!), to how the grant selection process often works, as well as ways in which those individual supporters are cultivated.

Each attendee had the opportunity to show a piece of their work and/or talk about their project. Everyone received feedback and advise from Adella or one of the guest speakers. This was worth the price of admission and then some. It appeared to not only benefit each participant to hear seasoned professional’s reaction to their work, but it offered a sampling of the other types of projects currently being produced. It’s easy for filmmakers to work in a vacuum, especially while in the midst of a production, but I think it’s really important to also be part of the collective. Workshops like Art of Asking support that.

Below are just a few of the many pointers mentioned by some of the speakers. These samples from the weekend might appear obvious, especially in the grant section, but as someone who reviews preservation applications (and as a preservationist, may I encourage everyone to add a “Preservation” category to your budget. Your docs deserve a long life!), you’d be surprised at how many overlook the basics. I know I have.

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.

90to5 is back

October 17th, 2015 by KirstenStudio
Respond

It’s already time again for the annual 90to5 Editing Challenge. Having been a juror for the last several years and again this year, I hope to encourage new and experienced editors to check it out. It not only provides a structure for a terrific exercise in editing, it’s a lot of fun and there are some cool awards for the winners.

90to5 challenges participants to recut a feature length public domain film down to a 5 minute story without compromising its integrity or clarity. This is by no means an easy task, so I commend our 90to5 editors for putting in the time. I guarantee that whether you take home the top prize or not, the editorial process is an important one.

In previous posts about 90to5 over the years, I’ve waxed on about the art of editing and my early experiences in a contest called Trailer Park, so I’ll refrain from repetition here, besides Larry Jordon articulates this much better.

Other great resources for editors are AOTG and Manhattan Edit Workshop. MEWSHOP has a YouTube channel with tons of short videos for editors, from technical and artistic how-to’s, given by MEWSHOP instructors and guest editors who are at the top in their field. Check out what Larry Silk had to say about his work on PUMPING IRON.

In closing, I’d like to point out why I’m partial to the 90to5 challenge, and it’s not just because they keep asking me to be a juror. This editing challenge is unique in a couple of ways. First and foremost is that it’s open to anyone and everyone. Other contests are terrific, but not as inclusive. I’ve learned that gifted editors and other kinds of storytellers come from all sorts of backgrounds and disciplines. The second is that it’s all online and attracts participants from around the world. Their forum allows contestants to yap about all things editing. This feature is underused, but I hope more folks will take advantage of it. The third is that 90to5  provides the editorial content by way of their resources page and at the same time gives fair warning about respecting copyright laws. Their blog and Facebook pages celebrate their participant’s work and offer insightful tips and tricks for aspiring editors. It also reminds the rest of us who have been working in the business for awhile about why editing is so much fun.

Tags:   · · · · · · No Comments.

JOHN HEMMER & THE SHOWGIRL’S trailer

July 29th, 2015 by KirstenStudio
Respond

Shameless self-promotion. This is the documentary project I’m in post-production on. To learn more about John Hemmer and those showgirls, please visit its page here.

John Hemmer & the Showgirls – 3 Minute Trailer from Kirsten Studio on Vimeo.

JOHN HEMMER & THE SHOWGIRLS is a web-based, character driven documentary experience in post-production.

The story chronicles the artistic life of singer/entertainer, John Hemmer, along with some of his community of fellow performers, many of who began their careers in the 1950’s and 1960’s, a heyday for supper clubs, cabaret and theater. To learn more visit: www.johnhemmerdocumentary.com

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.

Documentarians are ideal preservationists

March 28th, 2015 by KirstenStudio
Respond

Documentarians carry much responsibility as creators. They are often one or two person bands. As business managers, fundraisers, marketing gurus, adventurers and agents for change, they are not finished with the final cut of each film. On the contrary, they have just begun. They must know how to navigate film festivals and distribution. They must engage their works with communities and demonstrate impact. They are required to keep up with new technology and information with rapidly changing mediums and modernized platforms while continuing to garner audiences through traditional venues. In a world where it seems there are more non-fiction narratives out there than ever, there are also fewer storytellers making a full-time living as documentarians. That means that in addition to doing all this, many filmmakers are also performing side jobs, in and out of the field, in order to bring their stories to life. Of course if you are one of these people, I’m preaching to the choir.

I bring this up because with all the above in mind, it is a lot to ask of independent filmmakers to become archivists of their own work over their lifetime. A task that requires, yet again, more funding, and yet again, more upkeep with the ever evolving (or devolving – your choice) technology that is involved in our industry. Not only that, but storytellers are being told to start this process now, if they haven’t already. Yes, it can feel overwhelming, but as is with the rest of our profession, it is challenging but achievable.

As someone who works in documentary, I have supported many struggling and talented filmmakers in a variety of roles, who churn out amazing stories through blood, sweat and tears. I too have toiled with some reward and disappointment with my own projects. With all the obsession, sacrifice and money that’s put into these productions, which can take years to make, would someone as smart and activist oriented as documentarians, allow their beautiful work to disappear over time?

LASMADREScroppedI ask only because I believe non-fiction filmmakers are the ideal (and necessary) candidates to become preservationists of their own work, as well as their community’s, because of their natural activist instincts (pictured left: Las Madres: The Mothers of Plaza de Mayo, 1985, preserved by Women’s Film Preservation Fund).

I propose to you documentary filmmakers out there to add “preservationist” to your portfolio of skills because:

• We can see from the beginning of the documentary form how historically and culturally relevant these works are too look back on decades later. In some cases these stories, points of view, insights and subjects otherwise may not have been captured.

• Your body of work over your lifetime will become your personal legacy as well as part of a collective documentary heritage of your generation, generations to come and society at large, but only if it’s around in the future.

• You are a non-corporate entity that tells stories often otherwise untold. Do you really want our moving image history to be all Disney and network, big business news?

• Your movies can generate income for years to come. There are limitless possibilities for continued distribution, but only if your master elements are alive and well, accessible and maintained (both your work and it’s playback equipment).

• That extra material on the cutting room floor, might be of additional historical and monetary value. Weren’t you just wondering how you’ll fund your next project? Your previous movie can be your future revenue in addition to your new production.

Behind the veilThere are many other reasons. These are just a few, but good to keep in mind because the hard work is ahead. If you agree but are unsure how to begin the process, you might start with these steps:

• Find out where your previous project’s original elements are. Don’t assume you know. Confirm this whether you recall that they are under your bed, in your mother’s closet, at an archive, or at your former business partner’s office.

• Examine those elements, whether analog or digital, they ALL need to be archived properly. Confirm what they are and what condition they are in.

• Talk to your resources (they exist! See bottom of this page for a short list, but there are more. Do your research). It is important for your elements to be properly stored and managed.

• Create a preservation plan just as you would create a production plan. Include funding sources just as you would when researching for your production and post production grants.

• When beginning a new production’s budget, include an archive line item. Don’t hate me. You’ll be thankful later. Do your research just like you would any other expense and add it in there. This will save time and money later.

• Get to know preservation best practices with the same vigor you put toward learning how to shoot, edit or strategize your outreach.

• Get to know and build a relationship with an archive. Find out if your alma mater has a media archive and library that accepts alumni work, have you screened your film at a museum that houses an archive? Consider your existing resources to start out with. If they can’t be your archive, they might help you find one that will.

• Advocate for audiovisual preservation best practices to become part of the curriculum in film schools and addressed at film festivals, conferences and other industry events. Help makes this the norm, rather than an oddity.

Works are disintegrating in canisters, boxes, tape cases and on hard drives, as I write this blog. The sooner we get serious and active about this the better.

Okay, so that’s quite a few actions steps. As someone who is ardent about preservation, and in particular about documentary, I can attest that it’s similar to filmmaking- fascinating and frustrating. It can pay off, however, if you see it through. Logically, the more you understand it, the easier it becomes.

To begin, or continue this conversation, check out the International Documentary Association’s (IDA) and DOCNYC’s Documentary Preservation Summit, 3/31 – 4/1/15 at the IFC Center in New York. Here you can listen to panels, ask questions and contribute to an important discussion with your colleagues. The major players in the doc world will be there, from filmmakers (Barbara Kopple, Pennebaker, Sandra Shulberg) to organizations (The D-Word, those listed above and more.)

One characteristic that no one in documentary is short on is passion. Bring it all to the summit. (Pictured above: Behind the Veil, 1972, Preserved by WFPF).

Some resources: Al Larvick Conservation FundAssociation of Moving Image Archivists; Film Foundation; IndieCollect; Kickstarter Archives initiative; National Film Preservation Foundation; Women’s Film Preservation Fund.

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.

Women Writing the Language of Cinema

February 9th, 2015 by KirstenStudio
Respond

A week into the Women’s Film Preservation Fund’s (WFPF) Carte Blanche series at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), brings to mind how much has been accomplished by the Fund, as well as us how much work there is yet to be done.  I’ve been on the WFPF committee for just around 5 years now and continue to be amazed by the women behind the Fund and all that’s been achieved to save these works for future generations. And although WFPF screens most everything it has a hand in preserving, it is a rare opportunity to see so many of these films in an expansive series like this.

As the title of the series, Carte Blanche: Women’s Film Preservation Fund, Women Writing the Language of Cinema, suggests, the focus is on the women who have contributed to cinema’s heritage, and given a strong female voice to its history. It is also WFPF’s 20th anniversary celebration. (Promo Produced by Barbara Moss & cut by Suzanne Pancrazi)

With over 30 films already screened (most works preserved by WFPF) and another 5 days left in the series, almost every genre in film and many eras are represented, from silents, to animation, experimental, documentary, and even sex exploitation, the vast selections inhabit a most fascinating melting pot of creative vision. In my mind, what this series reinforces is how women have excelled in this craft, even if not always encouraged, and are natural storytellers.

SusanSeidelmanOpening night brought Desperately Seeking Susan, a 1985 film by Susan Seidelman, (pictured here introducing her film) to a full house, despite the challenging weather. Shot in New York City, much of the crew, including Seidelman, were New York Women in Film & Television (NYWIFT) members (NYWIFT is the organization which co-founded WFPF in conjunction with MoMA in 1995).

Seidelman reminisced on her time directing Desperately Seeking Susan and named many soon-to-be well known actors featured in her film, including one or two that are now household names. She also spoke eloquently about film preservation and its importance. She referred to a print she owned of her indy, Smithereens, which unbeknownst to her was, as she put it, “pickled” from poor storage and from this experience advocated for filmmakers to be aware of the importance of preservation. Desperately Seeking Susan, however, was in great shape and its vibrant colors and great performances have stood the test of time, while the retro fashions and old school tracks were terrific fun.

DanStreible2Thursday’s program, Orphan Preservation Stories, offered an interesting variety of works from 1916 to 2005. WFPF Co-Chair, Ina Archer presented, with Moving Image Archiving & Preservation (MIAP) Associate Professor/Director and Orphan Film Symposium leader, Dan Streible, (pictured) along with other presenters including, Kim Tarr, Madeline Schwartzman, Carmel Curtis, Julia Kim (pictured below), Candace Ming and Kara Van Malssen.

Excerpts from orphaned films My Lady of the Lilacs, Raisin’ Cotton, Barnard College Film Collection, The Movie Queen film series: The Movie Queen and The Movie Queen of BelfastMona’s Candle Light and the Helen Hill Home Movies were screened and discussed, as well as put into context for why these kinds of works are considered orphaned and why they are relevant. Orphans such as the well known Helen Hill Home Movies might be obvious choices for preservation in that Helen Hill was a significant voice in experimental film and community MyLadyoftheLilacsactivism, but works such as The Movie Queen films might appear less so to some. The Movie Queen films were produced in small towns where the townspeople were the stars and the local businesses, the sponsors. They were often screened, unedited, for the communities where they were shot and acted as a big local event with ticket sales and sometimes accompanied by live entertainment. Although these are considered “amateur” productions, and may not appear important on the surface, they document cultural history and are really pretty delightful to watch. As Archer pointed out on Thursday, the Movie Queen film credits, running more than 10 minutes in length, included details from the extras, down to the model of the cars featured, seem to remind us all that literally everyone is important.

1008Thursday evening showcased surrealism in film with the beautiful, Homage to Magritte (1975) (pictured) by Anita Thacher and When Pigs Fly (1993) by Sara Driver. Both filmmakers were in attendance and Driver spoke about the ratio of German women filmmakers to American. Not so surprisingly, and unfortunately, the numbers were not in our favor.

CrimTonight’s program will honor WFPF co-founder and filmmaker, Barbara Moss with a MoMA’s Modern Mondays event. The screening of  the documentary,  A Crime To Fit The Punishment (1982) will be followed by a discussion with co-directors Barbara Moss and Stephen Mack, along with Narrator, Lee Grant and Associate Curator of MoMA Film, Anne Morra. The evening will celebrate Barbara and her accomplishments, but will also celebrate the Women’s Film Preservation Fund’s 20 years, and counting, of preserving women’s legacy in cinema. Hope to see you there.

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.

Pioneering Women

November 1st, 2014 by KirstenStudio
Respond

In spite of the drizzle and drop in temperature, the faithful turned out for The Real Indies: A Closer Look at Orphan Films program, which appropriately opened last night, on Halloween, with Spider Baby (1968), and began today’s screenings with their Pioneering Women segment at 10AM this morning. Pioneering Women boasted a fascinating selection of films made by and about women, accompanied with presentation and discussion.

asbgHeather Linville (Academy Film Archive) presented a beautiful series of clips made by the explorer Aloha Wanderwell Baker. The documentarian, known in her day as ‘the world’s most widely travelled girl’ recorded her adventures by car, over four continents. The footage, shot primarily in the 1920’s, is incredible and Wanderwell, apparently standing at around 6 feet in height, is a gorgeous fearless force, easily identifiable whenever she appears in her recordings. Linville saved some of the best for last, showing a short excerpt of her early travel footage accompanied by audio of Wanderwell from the 1990’s, when she met with an archivist to watch 6 hours of her material together, recalling in great detail the circumstances of the reels. Linville wrapped up the presentation with clips of Wanderwell visiting with Mary Pickford and Douglas Fairbanks.

Susan Lazarus of Women’s Film Preservation Fund, introduced the Newsreel collective production of Make Out (1970, 5 mins) conceived by Geri Ashur. The script was created from a consciousness raising group, where they talked about what it was like to make-out in a car, through a young woman’s perspective. Make Out was preserved by a grant from the Women’s Film Preservation Fund in 2011 with in-kind services provided by Cineric.

PioneeringWomenA panel of filmmakers and preservationists, moderated by Antonia Lant (NYU Cinema Studies), followed these first two presentations with a discussion around preservation of women’s film work (seated left to right: Connie Field, Lisa Crafts, Antonia Lant, Susan Lazarus and Heather Linville). Lant brought up two main periods in film history where women had a strong hold in filmmaking – the silent era and the women’s movement of the 60’s and 70’s. Crafts said that for independent animators and for other independent filmmakers, coincided this golden age of independent film and the women’s movement. So there were hundreds and thousands of women making work. Whether that is part of the canon that’s studied, Crafts thought that really depended on the individual who’s teaching, but highlighted the importance of these types of films getting out to schools, so each generation can see that there were lots of strong, amazing and interesting women making work. Linville pointed out that from a preservation standpoint, these two heights for female filmmakers have their own difficulties with the elements in which they were shot on. In the silent era films were shot on nitrate film stock, which is highly flammable and in the 60’s and 70’s the material ended up being unstable and prone to quicker deterioration, whether it be color fading or audio deterioration from being recorded onto magnetic elements, or a variety of other issues. Linville added that with the silent era in particular, there are even fewer women’s films to preserve today. That we’ve often hear statistics from this period in general, such as 80 to 85% of silent era films are already lost. Linville said she’d be curious to know what the percentage of that are films made women. To reiterate Crafts talking point about education, Lazarus said the reason the Women’s Film Preservation Fund was founded in general was to show that women were involved in filmmaking from the beginning of the medium and  these works not only need to be preserved, but also shown and become part of a syllabus.

rosie-01The feature screened after this panel, also part of the Pioneering Women program was the Academy Film Archive preserved documentary, The Life and Times of Rosie the Riveter (1980), by Connie Fields. The film was added to the National Film Registry in 1996. The film brings to life, the real stories behind Rosie the Riveter, told by the actual Rosie’s selected from many interviews Connie Fields conducted in her research for the film, the documentary effectively juxtaposes these women’s experiences against the propaganda archival material of the day. Available on DVD through Clarity Films.

The Real Indies: A Close Look at Orphan Films was co-presented by The Academy, New York University and The Orphan Film Symposium.

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.

Reflections on Getting Real

October 11th, 2014 by KirstenStudio
Respond

About a week following the IDA Getting Real, Documentary Film Conference 2014, I find myself continuing to reflect on a fairly charged experience. From the first session GETTING REAL About the Doc Career, to the last I attended, From Distribution to Sustainability: Four Doc Filmmaker Case Studies, frank participation by both panelists and audience, was what made this conference a much needed call to action for filmmakers and the industry at large.

IMG_3892Thom Powers moderated the doc careers panel and opened by saying that when his students ask about sustainable professional lives as documentary filmmakers, he tells them that if he asked 50 doc filmmakers how they make a living, there would be 50 different answers. That pretty much was right on the money, as all panelists (huge panel) make their careers sustainable by balancing media making with other related work, such as teaching, commercial, work-for-hire as DP or editor, advertising, research, etc. Most love what they do, both filmmaking and otherwise, but all talked about sacrifice. Whether it was juggling a personal life/family by only working at odd hours and living off less sleep (i.e. Nina Gilden Seavey, a terrific panelist at multiple sessions) or accepting that a project will take much longer since it’s impossible to work on it full time, it was confirmed that the life of an independent filmmaker isn’t easy. Granted that it never really was, but once upon a time existed a clearer and realistic career path that was much less complicated.

Panelist Tina DiFeliciantonio is part of the newly formed Independent Documentary Sustainability Task Force, which is gathering data for a quantitative analysis of the industry. The Task Force is looking at how the music industry adjusted to the drastic change in their industry. Maybe independent filmmakers can learn from what musicians have already dealt with. DiFeliciantonio boldly pointed out what she called the elephant in the room, and that is, we participate in our own exploitation by exploiting those who work for us. Hard to hear, and easier said than done in terms of fixing the issues, when budgets are beyond thin, but how can we create a living wage for ourselves when we’re not paying one to our colleagues?

[Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.

Post brings the usual questions, and some new ones

September 20th, 2014 by KirstenStudio
Respond

John-Margo3It’s that time in a production’s life when primary photography has been completed and it’s time to devote almost all one’s hours toward the edit. Beginning post production is exciting, but also daunting. Hopefully footage has been brought into the project and logged, and interviews transcribed as the shoots have taken place. Hopefully the spreadsheets and budgets are updated, you’ve been reviewing footage as you’ve shot, and gotten into some cutting already. These are ‘hopefully’ scenarios, however, as more often than not (in my experience), these tasks are ideally done during the shooting phase, but sometimes they are just partially completed by the real edit time.

In my case, most of the above is complete, but not all, and although I’ve watched the footage after each shoot, I now need to sit down and review everything again beforeJohn_Jane_TimesSquare digging in for the long editing haul. It can be tedious, but also exciting when gems you didn’t realize (or remembered) existed in the footage materialize, even though you were there when it was recorded. Seemingly unimportant comments, behaviors or imagery can suddenly reveal themselves as insightful and telling. These are the essential moments for any sort of storytelling, big or small. After all, when it comes to most nonfiction narratives, post is when the story is crafted. Although this phase is my favorite, and I’ve been on enough productions now to know the nuts and bolts of how to tackle it, there are new questions on the horizon. For instance, once this story is complete, there are a number of traditional ways of getting it out into the world, but also a few new choices which are as confusing as they are thrilling to consider. New venues, new models, new avenues for impact – there are a lot of decisions to be made and each one seems to be on a case-by-case basis. What is one’s story most suited for?

This particular project will be a short, but never-the-less, it required scanning many-a still images (over 1,000) and shooting many hours of happenings. In my case (any many other filmmakers) this is done in tandem with other documentary and commercial freelance jobs, and therefore takes twice as long to finish. The project has yet to go through various phases and versions with feedback, recuts and consultations. As the post production phase begins, thoughts about the end plan (and budget) continue to change and morph as I consider the footage I have and the story I believe will come of it.

LQ_Luncheon2014With the landscape of documentary distribution in such flux (more opportunity in many ways, yet more competition), who knows what distribution will look like next year, or even 6 to 8 months from now. Documentary storytellers are on the rise, but with the market saturated with content, how will smaller projects, such as this one, get seen? How will it be monetized and how will its lifespan be maximized? These are questions I’m still kicking around, even at this point in the production, and one that will of course inform the end cut.

The International Documentary Association will put on their annual conference in Los Angeles in a couple of weeks and will be addressing some of these questions for mid-career documentary media makers. The Documentary Film Conference 2014, Getting Real three day event boasts keynote speakers Morgan Spurlock, Tabitha Jackson, Cara Mertes, Dawn Porter and Lucy Walker (notice the ratio of women to men. Thank you, IDA!). Panels includes Getting Real About The Doc Career, Let’s Make This Perfectly Clear (on digital distribution), When Impact Meets Distribution, Creative Money Balance: A Hands-on Workshop on Career Sustainability and Personal Finance, From Distribution to Sustainability: Four Doc Filmmaker Case Studies. Also included are forums, screenings and case studies. With the state of documentary growing in leaps and bounds, but documentary making as a viable, full time sustainable career at risk, the Getting Real 2014 should prove to be an informative one. See you there.

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.

Documentary Fundamentals’ Shooting & Directing

May 17th, 2014 by KirstenStudio
Respond

This spring the Brooklyn based resource for all things documentary, UnionDocs, offers its second round of Documentary Fundamentals. The six part series gives filmmakers a step-by step, how-to for tackling the art form. From practical application to creative, Fundamentals brings experts in the field into a conversational panel setting for a jam packed house.

Last night’s third installment, Documentary Shooting & Directing, was hosted by UnionDocs’ partner AbelCine at its Greenwich St. studio. The three person panel consisted of Zachary Heinzerling (Cutie And The Boxer), Ross Kauffman (Born into Brothels) and Malika Zouhali-Worrall (Call Me Kuchu). Each presented clips and/or trailers of their work to illustrate various approaches to shooting and directing.

Cutie-+-the-Boxer_sized-620x348Zachary Heinzerling spoke about non-verbal storytelling, where the visuals tell audiences what is happening and not just the dialogue, or even instead of. His example from Cutie And The Boxer was a dinner scene, where the husband and wife’s behavior during a meal reveals insights into their relationship as much as what they’re talking about. This kind of relaxed intimacy is something earned, however. Each speaker addressed the importance of fostering trust between filmmaker and subject. Heinzerling’s emphasized the idea of collaboration between himself and the people he’s filming. He tries to spend a lot of time with his documentary characters in advance to bring an ease to his presence. Even then people are hyper aware of the camera at first, he said, and want to know what’s going on. He makes it clear that he feels all aspects of their lives are of equal importance. This is something new to me as most of my experience is in post-production. I am green to shooting and directing and have recently discovered how much people skills it requires. I’ve found some subjects get caught up in wanting to know details, such as why something as mundane as making their bed or walking to work needs to be shot. I think that is about trust, and building it takes time and patience on the part of everyone involved. If the relationship isn’t developed, the subject may never open up, forget about the camera’s presence, or even believe that if it’s being recorded, it could be relevant or imporant. [Read more →]

Tags:   · · · · · · · · · · · · · No Comments.